[Qt-interest] Qt Development Frameworks

[Srdjan Todorovic]

On 13/08/2009, Oliver.Knoll at comit.ch <Oliver.Knoll at comit.ch> wrote:
> SABROG wrote on Wednesday, August 12, 2009 7:54 PM:
>
>> Can we now use short transcription "QDF" as Qt Development Frameworks?
>
> No. It's too short!

Hah. Is "Qt" not too short? :)

I, for one, will always remember it as Qt ("cutie") and Trolltech :)

Wow - I did see a post earlier from someone at trolltech.com that had
a troll.no domain as part of a link in the email.

One thing that did come to my mind - the KDE/Qt agreement (if Qt
becomes closed source or management put restrictions then immediately
it will be licensed as BSD) mentions "Qt" (from what I remember). In
general, if a product name is changed, does that invalidate the prior
agreement?

As in, in a court of law, the lawyers will point at the document and
say "ha! the product is not called Qt so we can ignore the agreement"?

Srdjan