[Qt-interest] future of a desktop UI

[Sylvain Pointeau]

thanks for your answer.
I understand your point, but seeing the big move and enthusiasm to Adobe
air, Google Chrome as an application runner, html 5 with local storage,
I feel like the tendency is here ...

I also find that it is easier to make an html pages + design,
that a client application ... less code and more customizable.
but here this is my subjective point of view, please don't hesitate to tell
me that I am wrong.

on top of that, if we can run in local an html appli, then we still have the
option to run it on a server ... then I see many advantages to stay
completely in html or web technology....

again this is my feeling for now, maybe I am wrong and I will find soon a
counter-example.

Cheers,
Sylvain



On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Martin Gebert
<martin.gebert at alpha-bit.de>wrote:

> > What do you think about the future of the desktop UI?
> > do you think we should move progressively to an interface
> > like "HTML" with webkit?
>
> There is no "we should"; do whatever fits *your* application's environment
> and the problem at hand. All attempts to declare fat client UIs dead by
> iterating this statement all over again are just bullshit bingo, and no
> excuse to stop thinking for yourself.
> My 5 cents.
>
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20090826/5f4582c8/attachment.html