[Qt-interest] Major buginQAbstractSocket'smethodwaitForReadyRead()

[Patric]

> Those are not tests. These are descriptions of your problem.
No these are my tests and the description of my problem is that the method 
is not always working.

> In which case, maybe your device has a bug ;)
Maybe, but not related to this problem. :)

>Not even a hello-echo program?
I would test it with great pleasure. But infortunately I have critical 
deadline here and currently no money. So I would prefer to utilize my time 
into finishing my work as fast as I can.

Thank you very much for your help, I just mentioned that there is possible 
bug in this method. :)

Best regards,
Patric




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Srdjan Todorovic" <todorovic.s at googlemail.com>
To: "qt-interest" <qt-interest at trolltech.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Qt-interest] Major 
buginQAbstractSocket'smethodwaitForReadyRead()


> Hi,
>
> On 25/06/2009, Patric <userqt at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>1. My network cable is plugged in. The first setRequest is successful, so
>>>it returns true. After that I'm removing the cable. The second request is
>>>unsuccessful, so it waits 5 seconds. And all other requests wait for 
>>> >five
>>>seconds. And this is the correct behaviour.
>>
>>
>>
>>>2. My cable IS NOT plugged. The first setRequest is unsuccessful, so it
>>>waits 5 seconds and continues with the second. But here ! it don't wait 5
>>>seconds, it immediately returns FALSE. Which I think is not >correct.
>>
>> These are the tests. I'm using a network module (hardware device) here 
>> which
>> I control via SNMP.
>
> Those are not tests. These are descriptions of your problem.
>
>>I can't write a small program, because it'll not be so
>> small and it'll not work without the device.
>
> In which case, maybe your device has a bug ;)
>
> Are you saying that you cannot create two simple programs and have
> each on two machines?
>
> Not even a hello-echo program?
>
>> But I'm using the method through the QUdpSocket class.
>> I'm just saying it's possible this method to have a bug with randam
>> occurance. I can't define what's the reason for it.
>
> Again, read below:
>
>>> Do you have source code for a small, simple program that you can send
>>> us, that does not do anything SNMP, and that still has this problem?
>>>
>>> Basically, you say there's a bug, we say "prove it!" :)
>
> Srdjan
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> signature database 4098 (20090522) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> 


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4098 (20090522) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com