[Qt-interest] Strange error on package creation, difference in libraries ?

[Patric]

That's really something interesting and new to me... 

Thank you very much for your answer. 

Patric
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: rajasekharan 
  To: qt-interest at trolltech.com 
  Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 1:21 PM
  Subject: Re: [Qt-interest] Strange error on package creation, difference in libraries ?


  The Microsoft Compiler really is significantly faster than mingw. Even the debug messages it provides are more descriptive and specific.

  Oliver Demetz wrote: 
Thiago Macieira schrieb:
  Patric wrote:
    Ah, I see.
And why is this done ? Why are there 2 copies of the dlls compiled with
two different compilers ?
      Because the Microsoft compiler produces much faster and better code than 
MinGW. So we decided to compile QtCreator with the Microsoft compiler 
because it gives you a better performance.
    
Hi,
this point is really interesting for me.
Is this true, that the Microsoft compiled code is faster and "better"? 
What does "better" mean in this context?

Also since I am not a friend of the newer versions (2005 and 2008) of 
Visual Studio, is this also the case for VS 2003?

Thank you for sharing your insights in advance,
with best regards,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
Qt-interest mailing list
Qt-interest at trolltech.com
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest

  



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Qt-interest mailing list
  Qt-interest at trolltech.com
  http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20090628/9a3d9e51/attachment.html