[Qt-interest] Strange error on package creation, difference in libraries ?

[rajasekharan]

The Microsoft Compiler really is significantly faster than mingw. Even 
the debug messages it provides are more descriptive and specific.

Oliver Demetz wrote:
> Thiago Macieira schrieb:
>    
>> Patric wrote:
>>      
>>> Ah, I see.
>>> And why is this done ? Why are there 2 copies of the dlls compiled with
>>> two different compilers ?
>>>        
>> Because the Microsoft compiler produces much faster and better code than
>> MinGW. So we decided to compile QtCreator with the Microsoft compiler
>> because it gives you a better performance.
>>      
>
> Hi,
> this point is really interesting for me.
> Is this true, that the Microsoft compiled code is faster and "better"?
> What does "better" mean in this context?
>
> Also since I am not a friend of the newer versions (2005 and 2008) of
> Visual Studio, is this also the case for VS 2003?
>
> Thank you for sharing your insights in advance,
> with best regards,
> Oliver
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
>    

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20090628/2595ea72/attachment.html