[Qt-interest] Qt on Android
Bob Hood
bhood2 at comcast.net
Mon Oct 26 17:42:12 CET 2009
Jason H wrote:
> ...Now, Qt is free so there's no profit there...
Um, check me if I'm wrong, but if you are going to develop an
application using Qt, whether that application is on the PC or on a
mobile device, you're going to need a **commercial** Qt license. If you
are going to make profit, then Nokia (rightly) expects to make a profit
as well.
Given the sizable license fee for the commercial use of Qt, I'd see that
as a large obstacle to having a lot of mobile developers wanting to use
it for their $0.99US fart-generating Android application. Unless I'm
mistaken, the iPhone and Android SDKs are free, so I have to wonder if
the effort on Nokia's part to port Qt to ride atop those would be worth
the return.
Render me gone, |||
Bob ^(===)^
---------------------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---------------------------------
The world needs more cults. They attract stupidity like a
magnet attracts metal, and they're self cleaning.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20091026/190f08ba/attachment.html
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list