[Qt-interest] Proposal: qmake shouldn't specify warning options when neither warn_on nor warn_off have been specified
Andreas Pakulat
apaku at gmx.de
Sun Apr 4 08:48:55 CEST 2010
On 04.04.10 03:42:09, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Currently, qmake only understands warn_on and warn_off in CONFIG. For
> warn_off, it uses a compiler option that completely disables all warning
> options. warn_on on the other hand uses an option that enables all
> warnings. There's no middle-ground, namely not using any
> warning-related compiler options and let the compiler only issue
> warnings that it deems serious enough to emit at its default warning level.
>
> My proposal here is that if the project file doesn't specify warn_on or
> warn_off, then qmake should generate Makefiles that do not contain any
> warning-switches for the compiler.
Sending a mail to this list doesn't really get you anywhere. Either file
a feature request on bugreports.qt.nokia.com or clone the Qt git
repository, implement a patch and send a merge request.
Andreas
--
You will have good luck and overcome many hardships.
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list