[Qt-interest] Licensing

[Constantin Makshin]

That page doesn't say anything related to the most ambiguous part of this discussion — are people using LGPL-ed version of Qt required to provide the source code of Qt along with their applications or pointing users to Qt web site is enough (unless they use modified Qt)?

On Sunday 30 May 2010 18:35:04 Philippe wrote:
> http://qt.nokia.com/products/licensing
> 
> On Sun, 30 May 2010 18:21:19 +0400
> Constantin Makshin <cmakshin at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But GNU, being the author of [L]GPL, can clarify ambiguous/questionable parts of those licenses, particularly requirement to distribute sources of third-party LGPL-ed libraries along with the program (or if giving users URLs to original developers of these libraries is enough, assuming they are used without modifications).
> > 
> > On Sunday 30 May 2010 10:43:34 Kustaa Nyholm wrote:
> > > So I'd suggest Phil to ask either GNU or Nokia to clarify his question.
> > > 
> > > GNU is not party to the agreement so their opinion might not be relevant, 
> > > Nokia is the copyright holder I presume.
> > > 
> > > br Kusti