[Qt-interest] Licensing

[JJDaNiMoTh]

On Sunday 30 May 2010 17:36:52 Constantin Makshin wrote:
> That page doesn't say anything related to the most ambiguous part of this
> discussion — are people using LGPL-ed version of Qt required to provide
> the source code of Qt along with their applications or pointing users to
> Qt web site is enough (unless they use modified Qt)?

On the webpages of KDE [1], and also on its public ftp repo [2], I don't see 
any distribuition of Qt sources. In the wiki, there are some paragraph which 
refer everytime to Qt in terms of "package which your distro provide to you".

Also, on qtapps.org or kdeapps.org, in all projects there are only sources of 
the program.


[1] www.kde.org
[2] ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20100530/81b8126e/attachment.bin