[Qt-interest] translation overhead on devices

pmqt71 pmqt71 at gmail.com
Mon May 31 15:56:00 CEST 2010


 I find Qt/WinCE performance not very good also after the loading phase, so
I'm thinking to implement a static-linked translation instead of the Qt
based translation.
Clearly there will be a version for each supported language, but it's not a
big problem.

pm




2010/5/29 Constantin Makshin <cmakshin at gmail.com>

 On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:52:04 pmqt71 wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I want to give translation support to my App, that is built for both
> desktop
> > and mobiles.
> >
> > The Win CE mobile version is actually not very fast, perhaps because I
> use
> > the free Qt version with .DLLs deployed on the device.
> Qt performance doesn't depend on what version you're using, free or
> commercial. Also, while Qt/WinCE applications taking a lot of time to load
> is a known (and, probably, unsolvable) problem, the overall performance is
> more than acceptable.
>
> > I'd like your thoughts about the further overhead introducing the
> > linguist/translation support.
> Unless you try to update your GUI too often, the overhead is minimal.
> Usually the slowest part of a program is the user making his/her decisions,
> entering text and clicking buttons. :)
>
> > thanks.
> > pm
>  _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20100531/91add26b/attachment.html 


More information about the Qt-interest-old mailing list