[Qt-interest] translation overhead on devices

[Rohan Prabhu]

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 7:26 PM, pmqt71 <pmqt71 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I find Qt/WinCE performance not very good also after the loading phase, so
> I'm thinking to implement a static-linked translation instead of the Qt
> based translation.


> Clearly there will be a version for each supported language, but it's not a
> big problem.
>
> pm

You can have the very same application allowing the user to choose
within different languages even if you build your applications
statically.

>
>
> 2010/5/29 Constantin Makshin <cmakshin at gmail.com>
>>
>> On Saturday 29 May 2010 12:52:04 pmqt71 wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I want to give translation support to my App, that is built for both
>> > desktop
>> > and mobiles.
>> >
>> > The Win CE mobile version is actually not very fast, perhaps because I
>> > use
>> > the free Qt version with .DLLs deployed on the device.
>> Qt performance doesn't depend on what version you're using, free or
>> commercial. Also, while Qt/WinCE applications taking a lot of time to load
>> is a known (and, probably, unsolvable) problem, the overall performance is
>> more than acceptable.
>>
>> > I'd like your thoughts about the further overhead introducing the
>> > linguist/translation support.
>> Unless you try to update your GUI too often, the overhead is minimal.
>> Usually the slowest part of a program is the user making his/her decisions,
>> entering text and clicking buttons. :)
>>
>> > thanks.
>> > pm
>> _______________________________________________
>> Qt-interest mailing list
>> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
>> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-interest mailing list
> Qt-interest at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-interest
>
>