[Qt-interest] The argument for Qt

[Stephen Kelly]

Till Oliver Knoll wrote:

> I found an interesting conversation in some forum archive about "Open
> Governance" in around April/May this year. The topic was also about
> whether that would cover 4.8.x or even a 4.9.x (as of now very unlikely to
> appear). The reasoning was that KDE would not be able to pick up Qt 5
> development (give or take a few desktop apps) until at least a year after
> Qt 5 is out, as Qt 5.0 won't be QML desktop ready! That means 2 to 3 years
> no new Qt features for KDE, as all new development will initially go into
> QML. Besides it remains to be seen how easy it is to port an existing
> QWidget onto Qt 5 and what the performance will be on systems without
> hardware OpenGL acceleration and virtual desktops such as Citrix - more
> and more common in "home office" environments.

You could have linked to it...

Is it this?

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.opengov/312