[Qt-interest] The argument for Qt
Till Oliver Knoll
till.oliver.knoll at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 22:25:31 CEST 2011
Am 18.10.2011 um 22:02 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras <realnc at arcor.de>:
> On 10/18/2011 10:54 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
>> But there are projects that do linger on, starving to death with no "end
>> in sight"... No one working on them...
>>
>> I understand the desktops of KDE and gnome aren't going anywhere that we
>> can see... But if KDE moved into the sunset, and no one really was using
>> it anymore...
>
> It seems that you yourself believe that Qt will go away.
No. That doesn't even seem so! That's just your perception!
Scott has a long record on this list with lots of helpul contributions and well thought arguments, so...
> It seems to me
> like you're simply trolling.
... I would be careful with such words.
Please try to keep up the level and don't fall back to such meaningless and IMHO childish arguments, this topic is sensitive enough already.
Thanks,
Oliver
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-interest-old/attachments/20111018/3e679796/attachment.html
More information about the Qt-interest-old
mailing list