[Qt-interest] The argument for Qt

[Nikos Chantziaras]

On 10/18/2011 11:23 PM, Till Oliver Knoll wrote:
>
>
> Am 18.10.2011 um 22:02 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras<realnc at arcor.de>:
>
>> On 10/18/2011 10:54 PM, Scott Aron Bloom wrote:
>>> But there are projects that do linger on, starving to death with no "end
>>> in sight"... No one working on them...
>>>
>>> I understand the desktops of KDE and gnome aren't going anywhere that we
>>> can see... But if KDE moved into the sunset, and no one really was using
>>> it anymore...
>>
>> It seems that you yourself believe that Qt will go away.
>
> No! That doesn't even seem so! That's just your perception!
>
> Scott has a long record on this list with lots of helpul contributions and well thought arguments, so...
>
>>   It seems to me
>> like you're simply trolling.
>
> ... I would be careful with such words.
>
> Please try to keep up the level and don't fall back to such meaningless and IMHO childish arguments, this topic is sensitive enough already.

I apologize.  I don't follow this list enough to always remember who's 
who :-)