[Qt-qml] import QtQuick 1.0

[Martin Jones]

In case anyone is wondering what happened to this, here is the task:

http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-13451

Martin.


On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:11:51 am ext Jason H wrote:
> I like this, and want to add that we wouldn't have to wait until 4.7.1 to
> start adding features back to QtQuick. (Blur, etc)
> 
> I really like the idea of a QtQuick release separate from Qt itself. Qt
> should only provide the raw Declarative Engine. Elements should be
> seperated into QtQuick, as I described previously.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Sean Harmer <sean.harmer at maps-technology.com>
> To: qt-qml at trolltech.com
> Sent: Sat, September 11, 2010 7:04:06 AM
> Subject: Re: [Qt-qml] import QtQuick 1.0
> 
> On Friday 10 September 2010 05:48:22 aaron.kennedy at nokia.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Currently all the core QML elements are in the “Qt” namespace, and the
> > namespace’s version is coupled to the Qt version (eg. 4.7).  In
> > retrospect we think this was a mistake.  And by “retrospect”, I mean “we
> > always knew this was a mistake but we never got around to fixing it”.
> > 
> > For Qt 4.7.1, we are considering introducing a new namespace - “QtQuick
> > 1.0”.
> 
> I agree this is a good idea, but why wait until Qt 4.7.1? Why not release
> another release candidate for 4.7.0 so that the change can go into the
> initial version of the 4.7 series rather than confusing things part way
> through. Better and clearer to get it right from the initial release of
> QtQuick I think.
> 
> ATB,
> 
> Sean
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-qml mailing list
> Qt-qml at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-qml mailing list
> Qt-qml at trolltech.com
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-qml

-- 
Martin