[Releasing] Current beta installers

casper.vandonderen at nokia.com casper.vandonderen at nokia.com
Wed Jul 25 11:33:20 CEST 2012

I obviously mean: It would be nice if you could let us know if you still
notice big gaps


On 7/25/12 10:15 AM, "Vandonderen Casper (Nokia-MP/Oslo)"
<casper.vandonderen at nokia.com> wrote:

>On 7/17/12 9:52 AM, "Vandonderen Casper (Nokia-MP/Oslo)"
><casper.vandonderen at nokia.com> wrote:
>>From: Mcdonald Jason (Nokia-MP/Brisbane)
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:19 AM
>>To: Vandonderen Casper (Nokia-MP/Oslo); Bornemann Joerg (Nokia-MP/Berlin)
>>Cc: releasing at qt-project.org
>>Subject: RE: [Releasing] Current beta installers
>>>> A more severe issue: the docs are almost completely missing from
>>>> assistant. Only the assistant docs are there.
>>>That is because we don't have qhelpgenerator available in the script
>>>that produces the installers, we just run "make >online_docs" in qtdoc
>>>and copy that over (I think).
>>>We should probably start running "make qch_docs" in qtdoc instead, which
>>>requires qhelpgenerator from qttools.
>>> The mksrc.sh script in qtrepotools/release-tools does that, but Digia
>>>aren't using that script for their packages right now.  Consequently,
>>>QtProject-generated source packages have docs, but Digia-generated
>>>packages do not.  That will hopefully get resolved soon.
>>> Note however that the docs in the QtProject-generated packages are
>>>missing hyperlinks to most of the QML docs.  The snapshot online docs
>>>from the doc team don't have as many missing links, so I'm guessing that
>>>there's either still something missing from the black magic in mksrc.sh
>>>or that its an offline versus online docs problem.
>>Hmm, there seems to be a difference somewhere, I'm getting 220 extra qdoc
>>errors when running "qch_docs".
>>Also the command for qhelpgenerator does not work by default (probably we
>>should use something different than "$${Qt.help.bins} to find
>>I will investigate.
>Most(/all) of the problems with the QCH docs should be resolved now. It
>would be nice if you still notice big gaps after Qt5 integration happens
>and the packages are generated again.

More information about the Releasing mailing list