[Releasing] Qt 5 alpha 20120314: linux g++ C++11: FAILURE

[kai.koehne at nokia.com]

>> I'll try that. That's the way I build Qt these days anyway, I was just
>> wondering if there was a better / more recommended way.
>>
>> I also recommend removing the configure and qt.pro from the top-level.
>>
> yes, we probably should do that for the alpha.

Huh? Doesn't the top level qt.pro contain the module dependencies? Do we seriously expect people to work them out on their own?

Given the choice, I'd rather propose that we only support -developer-build or -prefix="%PWD%/qtbase" in the alpha.

Regards

Kai