[Releasing] [Development] New installers available

[Knoll Lars]

Hi Stephen,

I think there should have been an answer on the list to the concern.

But having said that I don't think this should have blocked the RC. It's
something we can put into the known issues section on the wiki. And IMO it
was really important to finally get the RC out.

Cheers,
Lars

On 18.06.13 14:07, "Stephen Kelly" <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> wrote:

>On Tuesday, June 18, 2013 10:51:07 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
>> That change was unfortunately merged too late to be included to RC. It
>>will
>> be in the RC2 / 5.1.0 final.
>
>Hi there,
>
>That's not a very good answer. Anyone want to try again?
>
>Given that the question was asked, and given that I answered it within a
>few 
>hours, why was there no response along the lines of 'we don't care about
>your 
>change and we're going to ignore it', so that I could call such a
>response 
>unreasonable, and reiterate that the patch is important?
>
>> On Friday, June 14, 2013 14:33:02 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> > On Friday, June 14, 2013 11:52:37 Heikkinen Jani wrote:
>> > > does anyone know something else which
>> > > really
>> > > needs to be in before we can make the release candidate?
>> > This one:
>> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,58667
>
>
>
>Given that the question was asked, was any answer actually wanted?
>
>Given that there was no response, was the answer actually seen?
>
>Given that there was an answer, why didn't it block the RC?
>
>Given that there was an answer, was it discussed?
>
>Thanks,
>
>-- 
>Stephen Kelly <stephen.kelly at kdab.com> | Software Engineer
>KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
>www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
>KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions