[Releasing] [Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process
Tor Arne Vestbø
tor.arne.vestbo at qt.io
Thu Jan 5 16:45:34 CET 2017
On 04/01/2017 16:25, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> On tirsdag 3. januar 2017 08.02.21 CET Tuukka Turunen wrote:
>> Perhaps it is best to talk with marketing about the name of the "release
>> done immediately after branching to the .0 release branch". Reading the
>> discussion, it seems that other than the name we are well aligned.
> I'd try to follow standards, this is supposed to be primarily understood by
> developers. semver is the most sensible thing I know of when it comes to
> versions. #11 is pretty sensible:
Yes a thousand times yes.
More information about the Releasing