[Development] branch namespacing policy?
Oswald Buddenhagen
oswald.buddenhagen at digia.com
Tue Dec 18 22:15:04 CET 2012
moin,
prompted by the discussion about the blackberry branch, i again started
to wonder about a cleaner separation of the branches.
in the qtcreator repository for example i established the convention
that temporary branches must all have a wip/ prefix.
a similar convention could be adopted for vendor branches, say a vendor/
(gasp!) prefix.
go/no-go?
More information about the Development
mailing list