[Development] Reverting the QRegExp change?

Thiago Macieira thiago.macieira at intel.com
Thu May 3 12:42:13 CEST 2012

On quarta-feira, 2 de maio de 2012 09.00.37, lars.knoll at nokia.com wrote:
> In total I am more leaning towards reverting it, but would also be ok to
> add Oliviers patch. Let's hear some other opinions.

No one has expressed any kind of fondness to the current change, so it looks 
like we need to take action.

I think it's much simpler and safe to just revert it. While Olivier's patch is 
a nice way to try and fix something, just because it's different from Qt 4 it 
could potentially introduce unexpected consequences. Therefore, I'll upload 
now a patch to revert the change.

I will not upload patch to revert the adaptations though. Maintainers of 
modules who aren't sure about whether they should stay, feel free to revert 
them yourselves.

Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
     Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
     Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120503/2259cab8/attachment.sig>

More information about the Development mailing list