[Development] Help: Qt CS pre-scheduled sessions

[cristiano.di-flora at nokia.com]

Hi Quim,

I can (and would be happy to) arrange a session about QtPim APIs
(Contacts, Organizer, Versit) in 5.0 and changes / evolution of those APIs
from the QtMobility ones.
Gerrit / Git history for qtpim repo shows that the number of contributors
has been quite limited so far, so definitely a small room would be ok for
that session.
If somebody is interested, I am also open to adjust / create the agenda
for the session based on feedback given on this mailing list.
Cheers and see you soon in Berlin anyways ;)

Br,
-Cristiano

________________________________________
Cristiano di Flora, PhD

SW Architect / Technical lead,

Nokia MP - Qt Software development

Visiokatu 3
33720, Tampere (FINLAND)
________________________________________








On 5/16/12 9:20 PM, "Gil Quim (Nokia-DXM/SiliconValley)"
<quim.gil at nokia.com> wrote:

>On 05/15/2012 07:53 PM, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> I would like to preschedule a session to discuss the state of Qt5 on
>> various embedded devices. I can drive this session.
>
>OK, you got it. On Day 1, after lunch break.
>
>http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2012/wiki/Program
>
>The assumption is that you will start explaining the latest efforts done
>on Qt in embedded, show some stuff and then open for questions &
>discussion.
>
>Girish convinced me to add also
>
>Qt in Desktop
>Qt Wayland
>
>as session deserving the big room & video recording. I can see the big
>interest in those, so they are listed now as well. We still need to
>confirm speakers, though.
>
>This made Qt Core, Qt GUI and Qt Network move to smaller rooms, which is
>fine. If you think these or other pre-scheduled session fit better in a
>small room for 30 people let me know, please.
>
>> Can we also have a sessions for Qt Widgets and Qt components? I can
>> drive the former but not the latter.
>
>We can pre-schedule Qt Widgets if you or someone wants to run a session
>explaining the current situation and showing how it works in Qt 5. It
>can be useful to have this recorded. If we are talking about a BoF type
>of session to discuss about the future etc then maybe a smaller roo is
>better and therefore no pre-scheduling is really needed.
>
>Qt Components (or whatever is the name for this) is one of the topics
>expected in the plenary session Betting on Qt Quick. The Desktop
>components project can have there a person to showcase and explain their
>work, just like we expect others to do the same.
>
>Spin-off sessions are expected since this is a very hot topic. Which
>ones should be pre-scheduled in the big room? Desktop components has the
>ingredients to be one: added to Day 2.
>
>--
>Quim
>_______________________________________________
>Development mailing list
>Development at qt-project.org
>http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development