[Development] Removing Wacom support in Qt5
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Sun Sep 9 13:33:34 CEST 2012
On domingo, 9 de setembro de 2012 13.25.29, Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> The solution for a bug can never be to wilfully break existing applications!
> What can I as an application developer depend on if that's deemed
> acceptable? "Yeah, we had a feature, and yeah, people depend on it, but we
> don't give a damn." --- that's the message. And no matter how you dress it
> up with inevitability and force majeure and whatever, that doesn't change
> the message that Qt cannot be depended upon by application developers.
If it will make you sleep better at night, then it's a bug.
A bug means that it's unintentional and we'll correct the situation in a
future release. So you can depend on Qt: we will make things work and keep
them working.
We just can't promise when that will be. And except when they break.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20120909/105e13f8/attachment.sig>
More information about the Development
mailing list