[Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

[liuyanghejerry]

Good points. And I think documents of yours is much better, too. It's 
very promising.

? 2013/8/15 17:01, Kurt Pattyn ??:
> Yes, I know about the project. About a year ago, I started using that, 
> but it was not fit for purpose. I needed to transmit large quantities 
> of CT and mammography images, and it was too slow (the reason was that 
> the implementation does not send the data frame per frame, but 
> captures all the data in a list, and once complete sends it over).
> Also, on the receiving side it only had signals for received frames, 
> and not for complete messages (and there is nowhere an indication if a 
> frame is the last one in a message or not).
> Furthermore, there is no to little error checking, nor is there 
> checking on valid UTF-8 sequences (and this is still the case after a 
> quick look into the code). And then there were the severe memory leaks.
> So, the code was full of problems. I started improving it, but very 
> fast I realised that I was just rewriting it. Therefore, I started 
> with a clean slate.
> I see that there are still a lot of updates to the code, to fix bugs 
> and memory leaks.
>
> QWebSockets passes the Autobahn FuzzingClient Testsuite, on all major 
> browsers, including Safari Mobile, and IE7/8/9 (with ChromeFrame), and 
> the Autobahn FuzzingServer TestSuite; only failure is 'non-standard' 
> handling for Unicode non-control characters, but that is perfectly 
> acceptable - see the Rationale on the GitHub page; the problem is in 
> the QTextDecoder class.
>
> Regarding add-on or not, I let Shane decide what seems most feasible.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kurt
>
> On 15 Aug 2013, at 05:44, development-request at qt-project.org 
> <mailto:development-request at qt-project.org> wrote:
>
>> *From:*liuyanghejerry <liuyanghejerry at 126.com 
>> <mailto:liuyanghejerry at 126.com>>
>> *Subject:**Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets*
>> *Date:*15 Aug 2013 03:09:03 GMT+02:00
>> *To:*development at qt-project.org <mailto:development at qt-project.org>
>>
>>
>> Well, I'm interested in websocket. Since websocket has been one of 
>> the most popular protocols among internet, espcially in real-time 
>> based websites. It's good to see it in Qt, no matter as add-on or 
>> directly in the source.
>>
>> But in my own opinion, add-on may loss support during version bump of 
>> Qt. Last time I checked around add-ons, there were still some of them 
>> remain in 4.8.
>>
>> BTW, there's another implementation of websocket in Qt[1], I have no 
>> idea what's the difference of yours and this one.
>>
>> [1]:https://gitorious.org/qtwebsocket 
>> <https://gitorious.org/qtwebsocket#more>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130816/2615bd00/attachment.html>