[Development] Code Coverage of QtBase - new report available online

[Sébastien Fricker]

I have added a summary of your suggestion in the froglogic forum:
http://www.froglogic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=430&start=0

You can add your comments here.
Just note, that all messages are going to the moderation queue to avoid spams.




Am 01.02.2013 um 12:04 schrieb Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com>:

> On sexta-feira, 1 de fevereiro de 2013 11.26.20, Sébastien Fricker wrote:
>>> qtsdk master doesn't make sense for daily reports because it only moves
>>> during release times. It would need to be the qt5.git repository and we
>>> go back to a choice of the three branches.
>> 
>> So you would prefer to track the coverage of the dev branch of each module?
> 
> Yes, I would prefer coverage on dev, which is where development is happening 
> and where, potentially, new code without enough coverage could be merged in.
> 
> Tracking stable would work too, for now. Maybe not in the future.
> 
> Tracking releases is not useful. By the time we get any reports, it's too 
> late.
> 
> -- 
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20130201/b3c192ad/attachment.html>