[Development] Important OSX 10.9.5 & 10.10 codesign changes

Adam Strzelecki ono at java.pl
Wed Oct 22 14:53:42 CEST 2014

> It looks like we have to leave this to to the deployment solution (macdeployqt does not deploy the file).

I understand, however then we get frameworks that cannot be code-signed if copied just straight from the folder just because this single .prl file.

Can you please share some details why this can be problematic to move .prl files one level up?

There are already .la files there, so accompanying .prl there will be even more consistent. Moreover they will not clash with static libraries at these use lib prefix, i.e. libQtCore.prl is for libQtCore.a while QtCore.prl is for QtCore.framework.


More information about the Development mailing list