[Development] Updating the licence policy for Qt Project

Knoll Lars Lars.Knoll at digia.com
Mon Sep 1 08:38:16 CEST 2014


On 01/09/14 04:20, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:

>On Friday 22 August 2014 07:21:38 Knoll Lars wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> As you've seen in my blog post on Wednesday, Digia has decided to add
>
>I believe there are no more remaining objections from this plan. The only
>one 
>was Ossi asking about the LGPLv3-only case, which has been addressed.
>
>Ossi also requested that we state a preference for which licence
>combination 
>the project prefers. If we do that, it comes in addition to the
>acceptance of 
>the licence changes.
>
>So I believe we should consider this an accepted decision of the Qt
>Project.

Agreed.

In terms of preference I think we should state that the license has to
include LGPLv3/commercial. It should include GPLv2 if this doesn’t
conflict with some other license used (ie. Apache 2.0).

Cheers,
Lars



More information about the Development mailing list