[Development] Qt LTS & C++11 plans (CopperSpice)
Pau Garcia i Quiles
pgquiles at elpauer.org
Tue Jul 21 22:39:25 CEST 2015
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Ansel Sermersheim <ansel at copperspice.com>
wrote:
As to your question about relicensing, can you please elaborate on what
> this is referring to? As long as Qt is covered by the current license,
> we can not relicense CopperSpice since we are bound by the terms of the
> licenses under which we forked the code.
>
>
I think the actual question(s) were:
- Are you and Barbara developing CopperSpice full-time, part-time or
just on your spare time?
- How do you sustain development of CopperSpice? Support & services to
Qt4 delopers? You use it only for your own (paid-for) projects? Venture
Capital? No funding at all, just hobby?
And I would repeat the question Milian asked: why did you fork Qt4 instead
of Qt5?
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20150721/feb4bc37/attachment.html>
More information about the Development
mailing list