[Development] New Module for Serial Buses

Kurt Pattyn pattyn.kurt at gmail.com
Fri May 29 13:49:03 CEST 2015


I wonder if you also need hot-plug detection?

> On 29 May 2015, at 11:43, Viironen Kalle <kalle.viironen at theqtcompany.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 28/05/15 09:22, "Knoll Lars" <Lars.Knoll at theqtcompany.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 26/05/15 20:14, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tuesday 26 May 2015 17:40:05 Viironen Kalle wrote:
>>>> On 26/05/15 19:42, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Tuesday 26 May 2015 15:19:26 Hausmann Simon wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Good point :)
>>>>>> I was under the assumption that the concepts are too different, but
>>>> if
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> aren't then maybe a joint module would make sense.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> At the very least it's a superset and QtSerialPort (the library)
>>>> should
>>>>> be 
>>>>> moved into the new module. It's just two classes anyway.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> I fully agree. At some point QtSerialPort should be moved under this
>>>> new
>>>> module. Problem with QtSerialPort is that it’s so tightly tied into
>>>> RS-232
>>>> functionality that its extension to support other serial buses isn’t
>>>> feasible.
>>> 
>>> Fair enough.
>>> 
>>> Can you give an overview of what classes you'd like to have and how
>>> QSerialPort and QSerialPortInfo would fit into the naming scheme?
>> 
>> I’m all for having a new module and would prefer Qt SerialBus over Qt Bus.
>> 
>> Grouping QSerialPort under it would make sense, but we’d need to
>> reconsider the naming of these classes in this case. If we have a couple
>> of different new implementations for other things such as CAN, i2c etc, we
>> might need slightly less generic class names for them.
>> 
>> So I’d also appreciate a quick overview over the new classes you’d like to
>> add, and how we could get the overall class naming to work out.
> 
> In the first mail there is an pdf attachment that describes the high level
> structure as it’s planned. So the architecture would be pretty much like
> what’s used in qtsensors module.
> 
> The core classes in QtSerialBus would be something like:
> - QSerialBus
> - QSerialBusDeviceBackend
> - QSerialBusPluginInterface
> - QSerialBusPluginFactory
> 
> - QSerialBusDevice (inherits QIODevice)
> - QSerialBusDeviceFilter
> 
> All bus specific functionality would be in backend plugins and in bus
> specific classes inherited from QSerialBusDevice and
> QSerialBusDeviceFilter.
> 
> So the idea is not to hide the actual bus from application developer but
> rather to provide an easy to use core architecture that can be used when
> developing support for different serial buses.
> 
> -Kalle
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development




More information about the Development mailing list