[Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Thu Dec 22 21:09:28 CET 2016
Em quinta-feira, 22 de dezembro de 2016, às 12:54:08 BRST, Tuukka Turunen
> > And besides, alpha and beta are traditional and well understood.
> > (Following that pattern though, I guess we ought to call the RC a
> > “gamma”, but that’s not traditional for some reason.)
> If we do not want to call the first development release from the release
> branch "Release Candidate 1", then I think calling it "Release Preview" is
> a good approach.
Call it beta 2 (or gamma 1) right after branch and one we've iterated and we
could have released, we call it release candidate. We release them more often,
with more iterations, so that we get more feedback. I think that's the most
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Development