[Development] Staging in '5.6'

[Marc Mutz]

On 2017-10-13 14:30, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> How about instead we require two +2 for changes to 5.6?

How about the release team locks the branch down and cherry-picks bug 
fixes from younger branches to 5.6 as it sees fit, and we require a +2 
from the module maintainer or the patch's original author on the 5.6 
branch?

I don't see why any sane developer would go to the length of preparing a 
change for 5.6 if he has no idea about whether the release team will 
merge or reject it.

Thanks,
Marc