[Development] Renamed: Running a service for Qt community

[Joerg Bornemann]

On 5/20/21 5:16 PM, Jason H wrote:

> *if you wonder why I keep calling them Digia and not the Qt Company, it is because the actions of late don't really feel like Qt of old (Nokia, TrollTech) would have treated opens source users that way. Looking at the management: https://investors.qt.io/governance/management/ only 2 came from Nokia, the rest are from Digia or have been hired since. To me, this explains the change of behavior by Qt's controlling entity.

In addition to Robert's correction, I want to mention two things.

1. In the glorious days of Trolltech and Qt 3.3.3, the Windows port, for 
example, of Qt was commercial-only. The open-source part of the dual 
license was GPL. Contributions from outside the company were nearby 
non-existent.

2. With snide remarks it's the same with jokes: if you gotta explain 
them, it's usually a sign they lack cunning.



Cheers,

Joerg