[Development] Proposals for changes to "Precheck" feature

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Fri Mar 25 18:43:06 CET 2022

On 25/03/2022 17:54, Alexandru Croitor wrote:
> I would prefer a comment-based precheck system instead, and keep the existing precheck as-is.
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-4419

See also the other ideas in that bug report, most notably also allowing 
to somehow select a subset of platforms. No need of waste energy at 
building a patch everywhere if I know that e.g. it's problematic only on 
a couple of platforms.


Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4329 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20220325/1f6ec76b/attachment-0001.bin>

More information about the Development mailing list