[Development] C++20 comparisons @ Qt (was: Re: C++20 @ Qt)

[Thiago Macieira]

On Friday, 10 November 2023 00:11:11 PST Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
> On 09.11.23 16:28, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > But if the symbols are globally visible (ELF visibility STV_DEFAULT)
> 
> That counts as "exported", doesn't it?

Yes.

> Which leaves us with:
> - MSVC doesn't export anything by default; inline functions are,
> however, exported when the surrounding class is wholly exported
> - on all other platforms, all functions are by default "exported", but
> we emulate MSVC on those platforms by changing the default visibility to
> hidden, incl. for inline functions
> 
> And my previous questions:
> 
> - do our BC guarantees exist at all in the absence of
> `-fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden`?

Yes, we have to, because we don't control how the user's library is being 
compiled.

> - does making the Qt and std::ordering types BC with each other not
> solve the problem in this case, too?

It does. We should really do that for Qt 7.0.

The problem is that QPartialOrdering::Unordered has been in our ABI since 6.1 
and we can't change that any more.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/attachments/20231110/8c68a719/attachment.bin>