[Interest] QtSVG deprecated

Andreas Pakulat apaku at gmx.de
Wed Jan 11 17:33:22 CET 2012


On 11.01.12 08:11:19, Martin Holmes wrote:
> These are all good reasons why a fast, light implementation of SvgTiny 
> is a really good idea. And we have one,

No you don't. You have something which tries to implement Svg Tiny, but
apparently is not complete or bug-free.

> and it works well for the kind 
> of simple GUI graphics that show up in touch interfaces and on toolbars. 
> So I ask again: What's the process for lobbying to keep QtSvg as a 
> supported implementation of SvgTiny?

As Thiago said: Find someone to work on it, which probably means paying
someone to work on/maintain the codebase outside the Nokia/Qt team.

Andreas




More information about the Interest mailing list