[Interest] libeay32.dll - The Ordinal 4369 could not be located

Phil Hannent phil at hannent.co.uk
Fri Jan 24 15:34:03 CET 2014


Good afternoon,

Firstly thank you everybody for taking the time to reply to me, I
appreciate it very much. I have learnt quite a bit in the last few
hours.

1, This issue was never highlighted because the application didn't
explicitly require SSL, so it was never tested for as a feature.
During development I had no means to realise this bug was waiting in
the wings, I guess a best practice would be to run dependency walker
and look for the loading of DLL's outside of the deployment folder and
not Windows DLLs...
2, I made the mistake in saying that I did not have the OpenSSL DLL's
on my computer, I have two sets in fact, the first in C:\Program
Files\TortoiseHg and the second in C:\Program Files\CMake 2.8\bin\,
running Dependency Walker and watching the application load shows it
tries the TortoiseHg version and fails and then works with the CMake
version.
3, I now understand that bundling OpenSSL DLL's has export/import
implications: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3516143/qt-ssl-support-missing
4, Qt 5.2.0 appears to be wanting a newer version number, ideally the
1.0 or newer: https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtbase/source/d4f6d6e5dc5c9e92bae80ce1895c7d7c6fdbd577:dist/changes-5.2.0
perhaps the my user has an even older version in their System32
folder, I am waiting to hear.
5, If I place an old version in the folder with the application
0.9.8y, it works, however I still need to find out which version the
user has installed on their system to cause the pop-up message

I have a version 1.0 that I can bundle next to the application and to
use that. It would certainly be helpful to have the ability to toggle
where QLibrary searches in a bid to remove potential security and
usability issues, however that's clearly a philosophical point of
view.

Regards
Phil


On 24 January 2014 13:41, Scott Aron Bloom <scott.bloom at onshorecs.com> wrote:
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs.com at qt-project.org [mailto:interest-bounces+scott.bloom=onshorecs.com at qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Phil Hannent
> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 4:21 AM
> To: interest
> Subject: Re: [Interest] libeay32.dll - The Ordinal 4369 could not be located
>
> On 24 January 2014 11:43, Richard Moore <rich at kde.org> wrote:
>> On 24 January 2014 11:07, Phil Hannent <phil at hannent.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On 24 January 2014 10:57, Soroush Rabiei <soroush.rabiei at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> libeay32.dll belongs to OpenSSL library. I think you have to find
>>>> which DLL your code links against and copy it beside your
>>>> application. That will fix all (except legal possible issues). You can use dependency walk to find it.
>>>
>>> I am aware this is an OpenSSL library, however I don't actually
>>> depend on it. My application runs fine on development machines and
>>> clean test machines. The Qt 5.2.0 installation does not contain that
>>> DLL so I assume its compiled into a DLL like QtWebKit.
>>
>> Qt dynamically loads openssl (using QLibrary) when you try to use SSL
>> for the first time, so just because your application isn't linking to
>> it directly doesn't mean you don't depend on it. Qt does not have
>> openssl 'compiled into it' unless you build your own copy of Qt using
>> the -openssl-linked option.
>>
>>>
>>> The problem is that when the file exists Qt is picking it up, when it
>>> doesn't exist its using its own internal one. How can I get it to
>>> always use the internal one?
>>
>> There is no internal one.
> Great, thank you for the clarification.
>
> However could you explain how QtWebkit is able to view https pages when the libeasy32.dll is not in my path or next to the application?
> --------------------
>
> Most likely, some application, installed it into system32.. or some where else in the path
>
> When you run depends.. where does it pick it up from?
>
> Scott



More information about the Interest mailing list