[Interest] Qt5, XCB and X11
Thiago Macieira
thiago.macieira at intel.com
Fri Jul 11 17:44:57 CEST 2014
On Friday 11 July 2014 07:54:25 Rutledge Shawn wrote:
> GTK depends on them too, and LSB includes GTK; so I don't understand how it
> could be absent.
First of all, the libraries inside the LSB do not have to obey LSB itself.
What matters is that those libraries be present in the target system,
providing the interfaces that LSB requires them to.
How they go about accomplishing that is not part of the standard.
Second, the standardised version of GTK is pretty old. It links to libX11, not
to libxcb.
> > • One of the Linux distributions we deploy to (SLED 11) does not provide
> > up-to-date versions of these libraries
> How can it be considered compliant with LSB 4.1 then? If you built Qt in an
> environment that provides nothing more than LSB functionality, then Qt
> should not be able to depend on features that are absent in the LSB
> versions of the libs, right?
>
> Do you know which functions are missing in those libs, which Qt depends on?
>
> (Disclaimer: I've never tried to create a portable LSB binary before. Often
> it's enough to build on the oldest distro which you expect to support,
> because newer distros will have libs offering a superset of the
> functionality.)
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
More information about the Interest
mailing list