[Interest] Indie Mobil Program terminated?
Gian Maxera
gmaxera at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 16:44:55 CEST 2015
> On 2 Jul 2015, at 15:39, Alejandro Exojo <suy at badopi.org> wrote:
>
> El Thursday 02 July 2015, md at rpzdesign.com escribió:
>> Please explain how "Open Source version" can get approved in the IOS
>> Apple Store.
>
> It is a bit blurry why the LGPL version could not be used on Apple's store.
> See this threads, for example:
>
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-July/017529.html
>
> http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-August/018129.html
>
> I would not bet my money on redistributing my important app with the LGPL
> version without asking a lawyer, but for a small "Indie" application, I would.
>
> After all, there were people who published applications on the Apple store a
> long, long time ago. They did a port of Qt to iOS on the 4.8 times. And I
> don't think it was based on the commercial license:
>
> http://www.mediator-software.com/ <http://www.mediator-software.com/>
I think the big value of the Indie License was the additional add ons like the Qt in-app purchases.
I decided to buy an indie license at mid July because I didn’t find nothing good as Qt in-app purchase. But now ?!?!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20150702/ef5fd55a/attachment.html>
More information about the Interest
mailing list