[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

Emre Besirik nomercy at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 17:44:17 CEST 2016

> On 05 Apr 2016, at 18:29, Reinhardt Behm <rbehm at hushmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:03:35 NoMercy wrote:
>> And people keep saying that it is open source, you do it, why don't you do
>> it etc. well it maybe open source but I think Qt company is payed well
>> considering the license costs, why dont Qt Company do something about it?
>> isn't it Qt Company's official product after all?
> First please reply to the list and not to individual users. If I answered to 
> the list means that I am reading it. No need for direct copies to me.
> Second please don't top post even if you find this more "modern”.

I do not always use the same mail client and even though I try to clean up things, as I am a simply human, I may forget to do somethings occasionally.
And about the top-posting; thats really an argument belong to entirely different thread on its own. don’t get me started on the anti-topposting obsession/top-post allergy of people here please… And even though its not only me doing these “mistakes” you only seem to attack me over these, I’m wondering why...

> On which real data are just "statistics" based? Seeing many discussions in 
> this list as well as privately I doubt the validity of your numbers.

No real data actually but mere observations, don’t need any real data. its just my personal opinion, I do not claim to now for sure.

Emre Beşirik
nomercy at gmail.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20160405/d7f8420f/attachment.html>

More information about the Interest mailing list