[Interest] CLion to replace QtCreator?

Reinhardt Behm rbehm at hushmail.com
Tue Apr 5 17:58:57 CEST 2016

On Tuesday 05 April 2016 18:44:17 Emre Besirik wrote:
> > On 05 Apr 2016, at 18:29, Reinhardt Behm <rbehm at hushmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tuesday 05 April 2016 16:03:35 NoMercy wrote:
> >> And people keep saying that it is open source, you do it, why don't you
> >> do
> >> it etc. well it maybe open source but I think Qt company is payed well
> >> considering the license costs, why dont Qt Company do something about it?
> >> isn't it Qt Company's official product after all?
> > 
> > First please reply to the list and not to individual users. If I answered
> > to the list means that I am reading it. No need for direct copies to me.
> > Second please don't top post even if you find this more "modern”.
> I do not always use the same mail client and even though I try to clean up
> things, as I am a simply human, I may forget to do somethings occasionally.
> And about the top-posting; thats really an argument belong to entirely
> different thread on its own. don’t get me started on the anti-topposting
> obsession/top-post allergy of people here please… And even though its not
> only me doing these “mistakes” you only seem to attack me over these, I’m
> wondering why...

Maybe others don't.

> > On which real data are just "statistics" based? Seeing many discussions in
> > this list as well as privately I doubt the validity of your numbers.
> No real data actually but mere observations, don’t need any real data. its
> just my personal opinion, I do not claim to now for sure.

That tells a big story.
We do not need facts, we have an opinion.

Please go trolling somewhere else.


More information about the Interest mailing list