[Interest] FUD around licensing (From What don't you like about Qt?)

Giuseppe D'Angelo giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com
Mon Oct 10 15:18:10 CEST 2016


Hi,

On 10/10/16 10:22, Carel Combrink wrote:
> The very first comment on the youtube video:
> /"The latest versions do not seem to be free´╗┐/" - iddn
>
> I really hope the free edition of such a great tool can be moved out of
> the clutter about the licensing.


> PS: I wanted to reply directly on there but then got prompted to create
> a Youtube channel and there is no single link I can give someone for Qt
> Creator except by going into the page source and seeing it should
> be https://www.qt.io/download-open-source/#section-9

Thanks for that :)

I was about to ask if it would be possible to split that page in 
multiple (cross-linked) pages, in order to maximize SEO and getting 
better search engine hits; but then I found out that that particular 
page is actually deliberately excluded from search engines (there's a 
<meta> noindex in the page). :\

Regards,
-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dangelo at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company | Tel: UK +44-1625-809908
KDAB - The Qt Experts

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4007 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20161010/b1a6fa7d/attachment.bin>


More information about the Interest mailing list