[Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names

Jason H jhihn at gmx.com
Thu Aug 30 18:17:23 CEST 2018


Filed as https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-70272


> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM
> From: "Cédric CARRÉE" <cca at bespoon.com>
> To: interest at qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Interest] Standardizing Qt Kit Names
>
> On 30/08/2018 09:14, Tomasz Siekierda wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 at 20:17, André Pönitz <apoenitz at t-online.de> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 06:27:57PM +0200, Jason H wrote:
> >>> It might be a minor point, but I think it would be good to have more uniform kit name structure.
> > +1
> >
> > I'd also suggest keeping these names as consise as possible. For
> > example, I don't see a need to keep "Qt" in kit name... I know it is
> > Qt, no need to mention that. So "5.10.1 Desktop MinGW" should be
> > enough.
> +1 for a more uniform kit name structure.
> However, I disagree to remove mention to "Qt".
> I do use QtCreator to edit code which is not Qt code. QtCreator is a 
> very good IDE. I created my own custom kit for that. Thus I want to 
> easily identify kits which are Qt related from kits which are not.
> 
> Anyway, as Christian Gagneraud said, it will be hard to get a solution 
> that will fit everyone.
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Interest mailing list
> > Interest at qt-project.org
> > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cédric CARRÉE
> Développeur Logiciel -  BeSpoon
> 
> Tel: +33 4 58 82 88 88
> web: www.bespoon.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>



More information about the Interest mailing list