[Interest] QtQuick for mobile - any experience to share?

[ekke]

Am 28.05.18 um 11:25 schrieb Christoph Keller:
>
> You are correct, in my opinion the price for Qt is way too high if you
> only need the mobile platforms.
>
that's right
there should be a 30$ or so per Dev per month license for mobile platforms
really don't understand why Qt isn't pushing mobile Apps with a cheap
Indie Developer License
>
> That's the reason we're thinking about phasing out Qt in the next project.
>
sorry to hear
Qt is so GREAT on mobile platforms w QQC2
>
> You'll likely reach the $100k revenue with a 2-man project soon.
>
yep - with 2 or more devs you'll reach the limits soon

I'm a single developer working from my home office and it works for me
with StartUp License
@Sylvain: if you fit into the 100.000$ maximum I recommend to fill out
the formular and wait for answer from sales. I'm pretty sure you'll get
the license. I'm using this license with 99 $ / month and know that
there are some otherd evs out there using this license
>
> Don't forget there's also Google's Flutter in the game which is
> written in dart and renders all by itself like Qt does.
>
Flutter does a great work and is pushed by Google.
but: try to develop a x-platform project with Camera, BluetoothLE, ...
and compare with Qt ;-)
>
> React Native will give you all the joy of dependency management
> (cocoapods, gradle) and 3rdparty libraries available for mobile which
> will be hell to integrate with Qt (think of lottie animations and
> google maps for example). Also they support the nice "hot reload"
> (flutter also has this feature).
>
> Regards,
> Christoph
>
>
> On 27.05.18 10:13, Sylvain Pointeau wrote:
>> Hello Ekke, Jason, Jérôme, and all
>>
>> Thank you so much for sharing your experience and tips.
>>
>> Did you use the v-play components? how did you succeed to match the
>> native look and feel?
>>
>> My choice is between Qt and React Native.
>>
>> I would have gone with Qt but the price is the real barrier for me.
>> As I don't know the success of the app, it is hard to start (and
>> convince my partners) knowing the price to pay per year.
>>
>> Ekke you mention in your blog about the startup plan but as far as I
>> know, this is discontinued, the startup plan now let you use the
>> "trial" version until you go to the store. 
>>
>> React Native is fully in javascript, but seems typescript can be used
>> (which is much better) (BTW would be great to use typescript in QML). 
>>
>> The benefit of RN is IMO to do json natively, but the negative aspect
>> is that it is not as cross plateform as Qt, so the desktop version is
>> likely to be (much) more challenging.
>>
>> I am really puzzled, I think that Qt is better than RN, but the price ...
>>
>> Am I missing something? is there someone else in the same situation?
>>
>> ps: I continue to investigate (and to read the blog of Ekke), my
>> choice is not done yet.
>>  
>> Best regards,
>> Sylvain
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Interest mailing list
>> Interest at qt-project.org
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20180528/ad508f38/attachment.html>