[Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

Kim Hartman Kim.Hartman at tenasys.com
Fri Sep 28 00:26:19 CEST 2018


Good reference. Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Interest <interest-bounces+kim.hartman=tenasys.com at qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 12:15 PM
To: interest at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS

On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 23:53:17 PDT Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> Hi Kim,
> 
> Even partial Posix will help you get going. It is possible to do 
> without, but then more work will be needed.

I echo the part about POSIX. If you don't have a POSIX layer, you're going to have to port even things like filesystem support, so it's going to increase your workload considerably.

We don't require full POSIX, much less POSIX certification. Just look at
Android: their C library (Bionic) is a very crappy implementation of the POSIX specification, but it's sufficient for Qt needs. But the better your implementation is, the less you'll see me complain.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center



_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest



More information about the Interest mailing list