[Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS
Kim Hartman
Kim.Hartman at tenasys.com
Fri Sep 28 00:26:19 CEST 2018
Good reference. Thanks!
-----Original Message-----
From: Interest <interest-bounces+kim.hartman=tenasys.com at qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 12:15 PM
To: interest at qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Interest] Porting Qt to our RTOS
On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 23:53:17 PDT Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> Even partial Posix will help you get going. It is possible to do
> without, but then more work will be needed.
I echo the part about POSIX. If you don't have a POSIX layer, you're going to have to port even things like filesystem support, so it's going to increase your workload considerably.
We don't require full POSIX, much less POSIX certification. Just look at
Android: their C library (Bionic) is a very crappy implementation of the POSIX specification, but it's sufficient for Qt needs. But the better your implementation is, the less you'll see me complain.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Interest mailing list
Interest at qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
More information about the Interest
mailing list