[Interest] I love QML

[Quang Phú Bùi]

Agree with that.
Qt is an awesome tool to create an app with backend by C++ and UI by QML.
I'm waiting to touch Qt6 with new generation of QML

phubq

On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 00:44, ekke <ekke at ekkes-corner.org> wrote:

> +1 from me
>
> tomorrow it's exactly 42 years ago I started developing software
> (Assembler, COBOL, ...) and over all the years most fun is using Qt +
> QML to write mobile apps :)
> to be precise: fun started with Qt 4.8 + BlackBerry 10 Cascades, but in
> the meantime I'm very happy with QQC2
>
> I'm looking forward to Qt 6 / strict QML and my goal is to port
> (refactor) all my mobile apps (and blog about and probably write a book)
>
> thx to Qt I'm able to write performant complex mobile business apps in a
> short timeframe and all my users love their apps.
>
> from my POV Qt 6 + strict QML + new SmallBusiness - License should
> motivate mobile app devs to switch to Qt.
>
> ekke
> Am 02.07.20 um 17:50 schrieb Jérôme Godbout:
> > +1 totaly agree, we often forget to praise Qt for the great work. I have
> been through many framework (MFC, Xaml, wxWidgets, Xamarin...) but my
> favorite is still Qt with Qml. The binding often leverage the need for
> those view model or model convert to adapt to the view. The fact that I can
> have most of my lib (algo, GUI, controler...) into reusable code between
> desktop, mobile, embedded Yocto is such a huge win. I cannot wait for Qt 6
> and C++ binding, seriously it's probably the feature I'm most looking
> forward to, remove those conditional connect or complex (mostly hard to
> maintain) flow around connect.
> >
> > Long live Qt 😉
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Interest <interest-bounces at qt-project.org> On Behalf Of Jason H
> > Sent: July 2, 2020 11:24 AM
> > To: interestqt-project.org <interest at qt-project.org>; ulf.hermann at qt.io
> > Subject: [Interest] I love QML
> >
> > I know I spend a lot of time talking about inadequacies of Qt, but it's
> out of love. Since discovering Qt back in oh, 2001 when I was writing MFC
> apps, I have come to love the toolkit despite its rough edges. I have been
> assigned to port our Qt/QML app to Swift. And let me say what a joy it is
> working with Qt/QML.
> > - The ability to use JSON inline, and as a proper JavaScript Object is a
> huge feature that I did not appreciate previously.
> > - The property bindings system eliminates so much code and the automatic
> evaluation of bindings is phenomenal.
> > - The lack of a separated view and view controller makes reusable
> components even easier.
> > - The fact that I don't need to use UI machinations in a UI builder to
> build an app (I'm looking at you, @IBOutlet) is another joy
> > - The fact that Qt types don't seemingly duplicate each other in quirky
> ways (UIColor, CGColor)
> > - I could go on...
> >
> > I know Qt is going to offer an alternative to JS, but unless it has all
> those features (mainly the in-line JSON in actual JSON) I am likely to stay
> with the JavaScript version.
> >
> > A big big Thank You to the Qt team!
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Interest mailing list
> > Interest at qt-project.org
> > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
> > _______________________________________________
> > Interest mailing list
> > Interest at qt-project.org
> > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
>
> _______________________________________________
> Interest mailing list
> Interest at qt-project.org
> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/interest
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/interest/attachments/20200703/fb2cdf6e/attachment.html>