[Interest] Interest Digest, Vol 114, Issue 23

[Matthew Woehlke]

On 23/03/2021 01.21, Tuukka Turunen wrote:
> Feedback on the Qt 6 API is valuable and we are very interested in 
> it. Portability was one of the key design principles and we have 
> avoided making changes when not needed. That said, there can surely
> be some items that are unnecessarily changed.

Why are the QHash changes needed? The main outcome of that seems to be 
encouraging people to use std::unordered_map instead and destroying 
trust in Qt's API.

Why is QList removed? (I don't mean the *name* "QList", I mean the 
container with indirect storage and reference stability. It's useful, 
and unlike QHash, there is no STL equivalent available.)

-- 
Matthew