[Qt-creator] Some thoughts about 2.5
Geronimo Ma. Hernandez
geronimo013 at gmx.com
Wed May 30 05:53:01 CEST 2012
On Dienstag 29 Mai 2012, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Geronimo Ma. Hernandez
> <geronimo013 at gmx.com
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > But after all, netbeans, eclipse and even kdevelop have some nice
> > features. And if those features make live easier, why not go for it?
>
> Serious answer:
>
> It depends on the feature. Eclipse, in particular, is what results when
> people are encouraged to add features without constraint.
Agree!
Debian is the opposite. It has a strong quality service and a project leader,
that looks for quality, therefor it is not just the best linux, its also a
base for lots of variants.
I only like eclipse as an java ide. The rest ...
... let's change to talk about more pleasing things.
> I can't speak for myself, but one of the reasons that *I* am using
> QtCreator is that it is light-weight ...
That was my first impression aside the very attractive look: whow, its really
fast.
And even more: most things you need are there, where you look for it. That's
that much of intuitive, that I don't understand André's position respect to
debugger support - or better said: the reaction of an unsupported debugger
version.
May be my "poor" sounded respectless, where it never was that intention. At
that point, I was talking as user, not as developer.
Talking about consistency: a little version check together with a nice popup:
"your debugger version is unsupported. Please upgrade debugger to version xyz"
would match the high quality of the rest of QtCreator.
> But not at the cost of bloat or inconsistency.
Fully agree!
kind regards
Gero
More information about the Qt-creator
mailing list