[Qt-creator] TFS Plugin
spam2 at quati.info
Mon Oct 6 22:26:28 CEST 2014
Em , Tobias Hunger escreveu:
> On Oct 5, 2014 1:40 PM, "Diego Iastrubni" <diegoiast at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 1) JNI = pain
>> 2) Command line - means it will be easier for you to test and reproduce.
>> 3) Using an external command also means the build dependencies of QtCreator will be smaller.
> That is actually a very good point, if you will want to contribute your plugin at some point.
> I do not see us adding a dependency on Java for a pretty obscure versioning system.
> If you do want to keep your plugin separate, then that is if course not an issue.
> Best Regards,
My idea is contribute. This is really a big point.
I was "fighting" with my .pro file to make compilation easy on others
machines. The dependency on Java is really bad.
I decided not to use JNI.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Qt-creator