[PySide] PySide website, old Bugzilla

Srini Kommoori vasure at gmail.com
Thu May 10 09:57:02 CEST 2012


>mirror definitely is useful, I believe a full copy with complete
>search capability would be much preferable still.

We could add google custom search box and remove all the dead links from
static pages to make sure whoever is looking at the archive doesn't get
confused and also get the search feature.

> proposing handing the database contents to anyone volunteering.

That is the problem. If we find someone to host archive bugzilla, then we
wouldn't have this discussion.

Calling github for hobby projects is little weird. For reference:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux / redis/mongo/django

Could you please let us know what is the final plan for everything? Do you
think VM with wordpress is the best option? I could sponsor that but for
long term, keeping everything simple and automated is the best option for
the project to be successful.

thanks,
-Srini

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Matti Airas <mairas at iki.fi> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 10 May 2012 03:13, Srini Kommoori <vasure at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here is the archived bugzilla
> > db http://srinikom.github.com/pyside-bz-archive/
> > All the scripts and html pages are on master branch
> > at: https://github.com/srinikom/pyside-bz-archive
>
> I'm sorry if I was a bit terse in my previous email. While a static
> mirror definitely is useful, I believe a full copy with complete
> search capability would be much preferable still. That's why I was
> proposing handing the database contents to anyone volunteering.
>
> > We could do something similar for the whole documentation and other
> static
> > pages.
>
> The plan was to provide the documentation at
> doc-snapshot.qt-project.org, and the binaries via
> releases.qt-project.org. This integration provides PySide much more
> status and visibility than a hobby project setup at github, and in my
> opinion is much preferable.
>
> Also, for the main site, it should be possible to have PySide more
> prominently visible on the qt-project.org site itself, and therefore
> the separate site wouldn't bring that much added benefit.
>
> > Could you guys point me to the doc generating scripts/steps and I will
> try
> > to automate it.
>
> That would be very good - but for doc-snapshot.qt-project.org. :-)
>
> ma.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/pyside/attachments/20120510/1ba1cbc0/attachment.html>


More information about the PySide mailing list